Electrical potentials were recorded in epochs from 0 to 200 ms af

Electrical potentials were recorded in epochs from 0 to 200 ms after the stimulus. A total of 200 stimulus-related epochs were recorded for each measurement. Latencies and the peak-to-peak amplitude of the N20-P25 response component, which is assumed to be generated in the SI, were measured and compared before and after each intervention. In addition to an analysis of the raw amplitude data, paired-pulse suppression Alectinib was expressed as a ratio of the amplitude (P2/P1) of the second peak (P2) over the amplitude of the first peak (P1) (Fig. 1). Tactile two-point discrimination of the index fingers was assessed using a method of constant stimuli, as described previously

(Godde et al., 2000; Pleger et al., 2001; Dinse et al., 2003b). We used a specifically designed apparatus that allows a standardized and objective form of testing. In brief, seven pairs of rounded needle probes (diameter 200 μm), with separation distances between 0.7 and 2.5 mm in 0.3-mm steps, were used. Each distance Selleck MI-503 was presented eight times in a randomized order, resulting in 64 single trials per session. Subjects were aware that there were single needle-probe

stimuli presented, but not how often they would be presented. As a control, zero distance was tested using only a single needle probe. The number of single-needle presentations was 1/8, i.e. eight presentations in one session. The probes were mounted on a rotatable disc that allowed for rapid switching between distances. To accomplish a uniform and standardized stimulation, the disc was installed in front of a plate that could be moved up and down. The arm and fingers of subjects were fixed on the plate, which was moved up and down by

the experimenter. The down movement was arrested by a stopper at a fixed position above the probes (Fig. 2A). The test finger (index finger, or d2) was held in a hollow containing a small hole (diameter, 15 mm), through which the distal phalanx of the finger came to touch the probes, at approximately the same indentations in each trial. The probes were always presented parallel to the fingertip. Subjects had to decide immediately after touching the probes whether they had the sensation of touching one or two tips, simply by answering ‘one’ or ‘two’. After each session, individual discrimination thresholds were calculated. Sunitinib cell line The summed subject’s responses (‘1’ for one tip and ‘2’ for two tips) were plotted against the tip distance as a psychometric function, and were fitted with a logistic regression method (SPSS version 10.01). Thresholds as a marker for individual tactile performance were defined as the point at which a 50% correct response rate was obtained (Fig. 2B). In addition to analysing the two-point discrimination thresholds, we calculated the signal detection d′ index to control for response bias, which we report together with false alarm and hit rates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>