0 cm, with more nodular calcification and more blood vessels than

0 cm, with more nodular calcification and more blood vessels than prior Ultrasound (Fig. 1). (highly suspicious of malignancy). This Ultrasound examination revealed confirmed diagnosis. CT scans also provided helpful information. CT scans demonstrated a mass composed adipose tissue, soft tissue and calcification invading spermatic cord (Fig.2). Compared the two results of Ultrasound, nodular

calcifications and blood vessels can be found easily increased with time, and hint malignant. CT scan may identify the mass arised from spermatic cord, and composed adipose tissue, around soft tissue and calcification invading. All pre-operative learn more laboratory tests, including complete blood count, biochemistry and chest X-ray, were normal. The patient SB203580 datasheet was taken up for surgery through the inguinal approach. The spermatic cord was dissected and delivered out and it showed a hard lipomatous mass (7.0 cm × 5.0 cm × 2.8 cm). The gross appearance was a solid mass of adipose tissue with a yellowish lipoma-like texture of the cut-surface. It was encapsulated, and attached to the spermatic cord. Histological examination confirmed a well-differentiated liposarcoma. Conclusion: Ultrasound examination and CT scan may different liposarcomas from hernia and provide some characteristic imaging features of liposarcomas. Identifying

factors such as whether the fat is within the lesion, the origin of the lesions, and the presence of combined calcification is important for narrowing the differential diagnosis, medchemexpress since liposarcomas are malignant tumors derived embryologically from mesodermal tissues. This finding of calcifications in association with liposarcoma

has been previously noted in prior reports, but the sample sizes of those published case series were too small to achieve statistical significance. In spite of this, the presence of calcifications should not be regardless. Liposarcomas are known for local recurrences and longterm follow-up. Ultrasound and CT are good surveillance option to follow-up. Key Word(s): 1. Liposarcomas; 2. calcification; 3. Ultrasound; 4. CT; Presenting Author: CHENGYAN WANG Additional Authors: YALING XIONG, HUI WANG, CHUNHONG HAO Corresponding Author: CHENGYAN WANG Affiliations: Jilin cancer hospital Objective: Our aim is to diagnose the intractable abdominal mass by biopsy under ultrasound-guiding which could not be made a definitive diagnosis and treatment in clinical. Methods: 4 cases of abdominal mass were found by ultrasound and CT but could not diagnose. We tested and record the size, echo, location of every mass by ultrasound. The boundary of first mass was distinct and no adhesion with surrounding tissue; the second mass was adhesion with gall bladder and intestinal canal; capsule was found in the third mass ultrasonoscopy; the last was irregular shape and schistose aggregated. Puncture were performed under ultrasonographic guidance (GE, Logiq E9). Puncture point and position depend on mass location.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>