025–0.0025% of total CD4 T cells [57]. The background responses of most assays in naïve mice (<0.05% CD4 T cells) may obscure such populations [57]. Indeed, recent studies have had to employ enrichment of tetramer+ cells [58], to allow detection of rare TCM cells in BCG vaccinates [19] and [22]. Other in vitro expansion approaches, such as cultured ELISPOT [59] may also help to resolve this population. Therefore, we cannot

rule out the existence of undetected BCG-specific TCM. The check details existence of potential TCM cells has been demonstrated in adoptive-transfer experiments, where cells with a potential TCM phenotype (CD62Lhi/CD45RBhi, but unknown for CCR7) conferred modest protection [12] and [60]. In the absence of a robust TCM response, other potential mechanisms of protection in BCG abbreviated mice may include alternate T cell subsets secreting cytokines not examined in this study (e.g. TH17 [13]), or undetected CD8 T cells, B cells or ‘innate’ cell activation and imprinting [61]. Current models for assessing TB vaccines

compare performance against the BCG ‘gold standard’, which likely include persistent bacilli and thus active TEM responses. This may account for the inability to improve upon BCG often reported [62]. A model where protection is assessed against only long-term memory, such as the abbreviation Epacadostat purchase method used here, or other strategies to remove constant priming; may allow an enhanced ‘window of protection’ and subsequent identification of vaccines with potential for improved performance. This report has implications for the interpretation of immunity in pre-clinical models, with predominant responses dependent on antigen persistence. Therefore, studies which include such persistent BCG, not only demand a vaccine candidate to outperform the ‘gold standard’ in the face of constantly

primed TEffector and TEM responses; but also confound interpretation of the immunological analyses, with the dominant responses induced by live BCG undoubtedly obscuring the immune responses responsible for long-term memory-mediated protection. This underscores the importance of understanding the mechanisms of T cell memory. Conceived and enough designed the experiments: PJH DAK. Performed the experiments: DAK CGP. Analyzed the data: DAK PJH. Wrote the paper: DAK PJH. This work was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, United Kingdom under grant number SE3266 (www.defra.gov.uk). We are especially grateful for the excellent services provided by the AHVLA Animal Services Unit. We would like to thank Dr Belinda Dagg at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC, UK) for advice regarding antibiotic preparation and administration.