As an example, for the US FDA, incentives for orphan drug status include: tax incentives for conduct of clinical research; study design assistance from FDA; exemption from application filing fees; grants for phase I and II clinical trials; 7 years of marketing exclusivity after approval of the drug. On the other hand, diseases like HBV and HIV are well-known and widespread diseases, which are no longer considered eligible

for orphan drug status per se but which have a great potential for pharmaceutical profitability. Because of the large potential and profitable click here markets for new medications for HBV and HIV, pharmaceuticals will focus all their efforts on creating an uncomplicated, efficient and unobstructed pathway for their research and development. Introducing special populations of patients into their clinical trials increases the possibility that unforeseen and unwanted complications

or ‘safety signals’ may arise, which will ultimately delay, sidetrack, or even block drug development or approval. At a cost of billions of USD for research and development and a cost of 50–100 million USD for clinical trials, access of these Selleck GS 1101 trials to patients with the haemophilias and associated bleeding disorders could confound the complex toxicity profile for the new drug. For instance, if the haemophilia patient develops an alloantibody inhibitor or experiences increased bleeding events (HAART medications were associated with increased frequency and severity of intramuscular and visceral

bleeds in haemophiliacs), medchemexpress or develops an intracerebral haemorrhage and dies while on a clinical trial, how will those serious adverse events be interpreted by regulatory authorities? A direct drug toxicity? A reflection of drug-induced alteration of the immune system? Drug-clotting factor replacement therapy interactions which influence the metabolism of either or both medications? Furthermore, traditional randomized controlled clinical trials with new drugs are difficult to perform in isolated rare disease populations since the limited number of subjects will not allow for appropriate biostatistical interpretation or analysis. The use of surrogate markers and Bayesian probabilities and the pharmaceutical commitment to conduct postlicencing surveillance studies focusing on long-term safety might accelerate the clinical trial process and the subsequent fast-tracking through the regulatory process; however, in reality, nine of every 10 new pharmaceuticals fail during development because of unacceptable toxicity or underwhelming efficacy and for those individuals with the rare disease awaiting a new effective and safe drug, the requirements for fast track approval are still regarded as impediments to their acquisition to promising drugs.