Certain subgroup analyses, especially those examining regional differences, consisted of only 1 study in each region and thus should be interpreted with caution. The majority of study participants were younger than 7 years of age; only one single-season study presented www.selleckchem.com/products/Bleomycin-sulfate.html data for children and adolescents 7–17 years of age. However, LAIV efficacy in children and adolescents has not

been shown to vary as a function of age or pre-existing immunity to influenza [28]. Consistent with the previous meta-analysis by Rhorer et al., the present analysis used a fixed effects rather than a random effects model. A random effects model would be more appropriate if vaccine efficacy was assumed to differ among trials. However, the small number of trials available could result in a substantial Type I error rate [30]. Because the objective

of the current analysis was to provide a weighted average of vaccine efficacy estimates across multiple studies, a fixed effects model is more appropriate. In children 2 through 17 years of age, LAIV has demonstrated high efficacy after 2 doses in year 1 and after revaccination with a single dose in year 2. Efficacy was similar for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains. LAIV demonstrated greater efficacy compared with TIV in all 3 studies comparing the 2 vaccines. LAIV efficacy estimates relative to placebo and TIV for children from Europe, the United States, and Middle East were robust and were similar to or higher than those Epacadostat concentration observed in the overall population. This meta-analysis provides more precise estimates of LAIV efficacy among the approved pediatric age group and should provide reassurance regarding the routine use of LAIV in eligible children 2 years of age and older. This project was sponsored by MedImmune, LLC, a subsidiary of AstraZeneca. Drs. Ambrose

and Wu are MedImmune employees. Drs. Knuf and Wutzler have participated in an advisory board for AstraZeneca Dichloromethane dehalogenase and Dr. Knuf has lectured for AstraZeneca. Editorial assistance in developing this manuscript was provided by John E. Fincke, PhD, and Gerard P. Johnson, PhD, of Complete Healthcare Communications (Chadds Ford, PA) and funded by MedImmune. “
“On 25 April 2009 the World Health Organization (WHO) reported the emergence of a new influenza (H1N1) virus detected in North America [1]. This virus rapidly disseminated globally leading to the declaration of the first pandemic of the twenty-first century [2]. While the pandemic had moderate severity [3] and [4], specific risk groups appeared to have increased risk of morbidity and mortality, including pregnant women and individuals with chronic medical conditions [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9]. Vaccination is the most effective preventive measure against influenza [10] and [11], but the time required for influenza vaccine production meant that countries had to mitigate the first pandemic wave without a vaccine.