Hard material nanoparticles,

such as those based on silic

Hard material nanoparticles,

such as those based on silica, LBH589 mw gold, and calcium phosphate, have predominantly been examined for use as a delivery system [139] and have thus been engineered to promote antigen attachment. Attachment of antigen has been achieved through simple physical adsorption or more complex methods, such as chemical conjugation or encapsulation (Fig. 5). Adsorption of antigen onto a nanoparticle is generally based simply on charge or hydrophobic interaction [79], [140] and [141]. Therefore, the interaction between nanoparticle and antigen is relatively weak, which may lead to rapid disassociation of antigen and nanoparticle in vivo. Encapsulation and chemical conjugation provide for stronger interaction between nanoparticle and antigen. In encapsulation, antigens are mixed with nanoparticle precursors during synthesis, resulting in encapsulation of antigen when the precursors particulate into a nanoparticle [88]. Antigen is released

only when the nanoparticle has check details been decomposed in vivo or inside the cell. On the other hand, for chemical conjugation, antigen is chemically Modulators cross-linked to the surface of a nanoparticle [142]. Antigen is taken up by the cell together with the nanoparticle and is then released inside the cell. In soft matter nanoparticle delivery system, such as those based on VLPs, ISCOM, ISCOMATRIX™, or liposomes, attachment of antigen is achieved through chemical conjugation, adsorption, encapsulation, or fusion at DNA level [91], [94], [101], [102], [123], [124] and [125]. For nanoparticles to act as an immune potentiator, attachment or interaction between the nanoparticle and antigen is not necessary, and may be undesirable in cases where modification of antigenic structure occurs at the nanoparticle interface. Soft-matter nanoparticles, such as emulsion-based adjuvants MF59™ and AS03™, have been shown to adjuvant a target antigen even when they are injected independently of, and before, the antigen [143] and [144]. Building on this idea, formulation of immune potentiator nanoparticles with a target antigen could be possible

through simple mixing Linifanib (ABT-869) of nanoparticle and adjuvant, shortly prior to injection, with minimal association between nanoparticle and antigen needed. This approach has only recently been investigated for hard-material nanoparticle adjuvants, with results suggesting that nanoparticles may act as a size-dependent immune potentiator adjuvant even when not conjugated to the antigen [145]. This new finding is consistent with a number of other studies that have demonstrated induction of inflammatory immune responses after injection of hard material nanoparticles alone and without antigen [146] and [147]. Further studies into the use of nanoparticles as immune-potentiating adjuvants are clearly needed. As the interaction of nanoparticles with the immune system becomes more fully understood, we expect their impact to be broadened.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>