It is technically feasible to add additional VLPs to second-generation HPV vaccines, but there is probably a limit for how large amounts of antigen that can be included in combined vaccines without risking deteriorating responses against the major oncogenic HPV type, HPV16. Table 1 shows the cumulative proportion of the main HPV types present in cervical cancer, estimated for Europe from studies conducted by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) [75]. Approximately 52 000 new cases of cervical cancer occur yearly in Europe [76,77]. Thus, with

vaccination with HIF inhibitor review a 100% effective HPV16 vaccine, 34 000 incident cases of cervical cancer could be avoided. An HPV16/18 vaccine could potentially avoid 37 000 cases per year (71·5%) and an octavalent vaccine could potentially reduce the incidence with 88%. This simple calculation assumes Selleckchem C646 absence of ‘type replacement’ or cross-protection, which, respectively, should decrease or increase vaccine efficacy. Type replacement – what is meant and is it likely?  There is a theoretical concern

that eradication of some HPV types will cause post-vaccination emergence of disease caused by types not included in the vaccine, ‘type replacement’. Type replacement is a viral population dynamics phenomenon and is defined as elimination of some types causing an increase in incidence of other types. This effect can occur only if two conditions apply: (i) there exists partial competition among different types during natural infection and (ii) the vaccine does not afford cross-protection against types affected by this natural competition [78]. Several epidemiological studies have addressed the question of possible competition between different HPV types for infection. Presence of type-specific

antibodies (a marker of past or present infection) for one HPV type is associated with a strongly increased risk for also being seropositive for other HPV types, even when adjusted for determinants of sexual behaviour. For example, one study found the odds ratio (OR) for being seropositive for HPV16/18/33 Methocarbamol to be 2·9 (95% CI: 1·6–5·3) for women seropositive for HPV6/11 compared to those seronegative, even when the risk was adjusted for sexual behaviour and other sexually transmitted infections [79]. This is the opposite effect to that expected if there had been competition between the types. Furthermore, studies of multiple HPV DNA types in the same samples have, in general, not found interactions between types, nor clear examples of types of HPV DNA that are not found together, as would have been expected if there had been competition [80]. If anything, past infection with HPV appears to increase the likelihood that a new infection will be acquired. For example, Mendez et al.