\n\nMethods: Participants from a multiethnic population, recruited from primary care and specialist clinics were randomised to intensive intervention with structured

patient (DESMOND model) education (n = 94) or usual care by own health professional (n = 95). Primary outcome: change in HbA1c LY3023414 purchase at 18 months. Secondary outcomes: changes in blood pressure (BP), cholesterol, albuminuria, proportion reaching risk factor targets, modelled cardiovascular risk scores.\n\nResults: Mean (SD) age and diabetes duration of participants were 61.5 (10.5) and 11.5 (9.3) years, respectively. At 18 months, intensive intervention showed significant improvements in HbA1c (7.1(1.0) vs. 7.8(1.4)%, p < 0.0001), systolic BP (129(16) vs. 139(17) mmHg, p < 0.0001), diastolic BP (70(11) vs. 76(12) mmHg, p < 0.001), total cholesterol (3.7(0.8) vs. 4.1(0.9) mmol/l, p = 0.001). Moderate and severe hypoglycaemia was 11.2 vs. 29.0%; p = 0.001 and 0 vs. 17-AAG supplier 6.3%; p = 0.07, respectively. More intensive participants achieved >= 3 risk factor targets with greater reductions in cardiovascular risk scores.\n\nConclusions: Intensive intervention showed greater improvements in metabolic control and cardiovascular risk profile with lower rates of moderate and severe hypoglycaemia. Intensive glycaemic interventions should be underpinned by structured

education promoting self-management in T2DM. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.”
“Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) consists of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, both of which are associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The relationship between genetically determined polymorphic metabolism of exogenous substances by oxidation catalyzed by CYP2D6 isoenzyme and susceptibility to cancer has aroused great interest. We determined whether there was an association between susceptibility

to inflammatory bowel disease and particularly to CYP2D6 genotypes. The study was carried out in 39 patients with IBD. The control group consisted of 129 healthy volunteers. The CYP2D6 genotypes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method with DNA extracted from peripheral blood. Among 39 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, extensive metabolizer Compound C (EM) genotype constituted 97.4%. One patient (2.6%) was poor metabolizer with CYP2D6*4/CYP2D6*4 genotype. Results obtained in the inflammatory bowel disease group did not differ significantly from those of the control group. Although the odds ratio for EM metabolizers was about 3.8-fold greater in the group of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, this association was not statistically significant. This data also showed no overall statistically significant association between alleles and incidence risk of inflammatory bowel disease [odds ratio (OR) of 1.36 for CYP2D6*1 allele, 0.83 for CYP2D6*3 allele, and 0.