One patient (5.2%) had a stroke 2 days after urgent OPCAB. These observations suggest that the use of the Heartstring anastomotic device may be advantageous in high-risk this website patients with diseased ascending aorta requiring a prompt myocardial revascularization, whenever there is a place to insert this device safely into the ascending aorta. A recent meta-analysis addressed the efficacy of the Heartstring proximal Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical anastomotic device to reduce the risk of postoperative stroke after OPCAB.11 A total of 819 patients were enrolled from eight studies; six of them suffered

postoperative stroke. Cumulative analysis showed a pooled rate of immediate postoperative stroke after OPCAB with the use of Heartstring of 1.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.8–4.5). Sensitivity analysis including the only three studies evaluating patients with diseased ascending aorta as detected at epiaortic ultrasound showed that a pooled rate of stroke was 3.2% (95% CI 0.8–11.9). Six studies reported on immediate postoperative Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical mortality, and the pooled

mortality rate was 1.9% (95% CI 0.1–3.4). The results of this meta-analysis suggest that, on the one hand, the risk of stroke after OPCAB may not be markedly reduced by the use of Heartstring device; on the other hand, a rather low rate of stroke was observed among patients with Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical diseased ascending aorta, indicating its potential value in these patients. Since the majority of the analyzed studies included in this meta-analysis were of poor methodological quality, properly conducted prospective studies are needed to get more conclusive results on the safety and efficacy of the Heartstring anastomosis device. TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical IMPLANTATION (TAVI) Randomized studies (PARTNER I, II) Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an alternative option for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are classified as high-risk patients or patients not eligible for conventional aortic valve surgery. Quality-of-life (QOL) is a critical measure

of effectiveness of TAVI in this patient population. Two major studies paved the way to the increasing clinical use of TAVI.12,13 Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Many patients with severe aortic stenosis during and coexisting conditions are not candidates for surgical replacement of the aortic valve; this motivated Leon et al. to randomly assign 358 patients with severe aortic stenosis, whom surgeons considered not to be suitable candidates for surgery, to standard therapy or transfemoral transcatheter implantation of a balloon-expandable bovine pericardial valve.12 The primary end-point was the rate of death from any cause. Leon et al. found that 1) at 1 year, the rate of death from any cause was 30.7% with TAVI, as compared with 50.7% with standard therapy (hazard ratio with TAVI, 0.55, 95% CI 0.40–0.74, P < 0.001); 2) the rate of the composite end-point of death from any cause or repeat hospitalization was 42.5% with TAVI as compared with 71.6% with standard therapy (hazard ratio 0.