Th2 induction via low strength TCR stimulation can by-pass the requirement for exogenous IL-4 but requires a second signal, via CD28 co-stimulation.28 This simple observation highlights the importance of additional TCR-independent cell–cell interactions. Cognate antigen presented on MHC II molecules alone is usually insufficient to fully stimulate

αβ+ CD4+ T cells. For optimal activation, a TCR–MHC II synapse forms, re-arranging the local extracellular and intracellular landscape on both antigen-presenting cell and the responding T cell to allow additional cell-to-cell interactions. Of particular importance, B7 molecules (B7-1, CD80 and B7-2, CD86) on the antigen-presenting cell associate with CD28, and other members of the CD28 superfamily including inducible co-stimulator protein (ICOS), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 on the responding T cell. As mentioned above, along selleck compound with TCR stimulation, CD28 ligation is necessary, but also sufficient to stimulate il4 transcription. Inducible co-stimulator protein, another member of the CD28 superfamily, is expressed on naive αβ+ CD4+ T cells and is up-regulated on activated cells. In the absence of ICOS, Th2 differentiation is also abrogated.29 In the absence

of CD28, ICOS can provide co-stimulation find more for Th2 cells, albeit at a much lower efficiency than CD28, and rescue Th2 cell development. These studies suggest a hierarchy of co-stimulation, with a critical requirement for CD28 and a less important role for ICOS. CTLA-4 also interacts with B7 molecules on the antigen-presenting cell, but unlike CD28, which provides a stimulatory signal, CTLA-4 provides an Smoothened inhibitory signal. CTLA-4-deficient mice die of Th2-associated lymphoproliferative disorders,30 suggesting that CTLA-4 provides a critical inhibitory signal to Th2 cell development. In loss-of-function studies using CTLA-4-deficient TCR transgenic mice, Th2 differentiation in vitro was significantly enhanced following TCR and CD28 ligation.31 This was supported by in vitro gain-of-function

experiments where Th2 polarization was inhibited following stimulation of T cells with anti-CTLA-4 agonist antibodies during Th2 polarization.32 In vivo ligation of CD28 on T cells provides a lethal stimulation in CTLA-4-deficient mice driving IL-4 production33 and Th2-mediated lymphoproliferation. These data further support the notion that CTLA-4 is a potent inhibitor of Th2 cell development. However, using anti-CTLA-4 blocking antibodies in vivo, Th2 cell responses appeared to develop normally following infection with the filarial nematode, Litomosoides sigmodontis.34 The apparent conflict in results may be because of the TCR transgenic system used, reductionist in vitro systems not translating to in vivo scenarios where additional co-stimulation may compensate for the lack of CTLA-4.