The indicator

scores are aggregated into issues and further into the sustainability pillars. Our systematic indicator set applications at two study sites, show that the results have a high variability on all aggregation levels. Reliable spatial comparisons of the state of sustainability in different regions and countries are highly impractical, as are time series applications for single sites. This is a result of short-comings in AG-014699 mouse the availability, quality, and spatial resolution of data, the indicator set and methodology itself, and factors such as human subjectivity. The cultural, national educational and disciplinary background of the evaluator plays an important role as well. For these reasons, the indicator set and the calculation methodology require a thorough revision. However, to our mind, the numerical result of an indicator application is less important than the application process itself. The application process can initiate and guide a discussion about sustainability at the municipal level. To improve the reproducibility and reliability Epigenetics Compound Library price of indicator results, a homogenous, well defined administrative unit should be selected; municipalities seem most suitable for this. An experienced person who is familiar with indicator sets and methodologies should carry out the application in close interaction

with local representatives and should serve as a moderator in the discussion workshops. A stepwise process with workshops is necessary to adjust the indicator set to local needs and to discuss the results. 40 work hours (one week) seems sufficient to carry out the basic core-indicator application exercise. To stimulate the adaptation of this methodology, it must cAMP provide clear benefits for municipalities. The initiation of a learning- and awareness-building process and the desire to support strategic planning towards sustainability alone might not be sufficient as motivations. We recommended the

combination of the SUSTAIN methodology with the QualityCoast labelling system. This could ensure a concrete economic and promotional benefit for municipalities. The work has been part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund INTERREG IVC programme project SUSTAIN and by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research within the project RADOST (01LR0807B). “
“The effects of climate change on waterborne and vector-borne diseases are intensively studied and have high relevance for public health (e.g. Epstein, 2002, Patz et al., 2005 and Lafferty, 2009). Examples are ongoing discussions of climate change effects on the infection risk of dengue fever (Hales et al. 2002), malaria (Paaijmans et al., 2009) and cholera (Lipp et al., 2002). Increasing temperatures due to climate change can have multiple effects on vectors and diseases (Gubler et al., 2001 and Hunter, 2003), will alter the survival conditions for several human-pathogenic microorganisms, and allows the invasion of new vectors and diseases.