We observed map plasticity in every group that we mapped within 20 days of the beginning of training or NBS low-tone pairing. However, we did not observe map plasticity in any of the groups that were mapped >35 days after the beginning of training or NBS low-tone pairing. These results confirm that map plasticity Doxorubicin in vitro is a transient phenomenon that occurs during the first few weeks of discrimination training. In naive rats with no behavior training or NBS-tone pairing,

the representation of low and high tones is approximately equal (Figure 4A, black square). We quantified map plasticity by measuring the ratio of the A1 surface area responding to a 2 kHz tone and a 19 kHz tone at 60 dB SPL (Figures

4A and S1). To confirm that training alone was sufficient to generate map plasticity, a Behavior Alone group (n = 6 rats, 311 A1 sites) was trained to perform the low-frequency discrimination task, but had no NBS-tone pairing (Figure 4B). As expected, these rats exhibited significant low-frequency map plasticity. Fifty percent more neurons responded to low-frequency tones compared to high-frequency tones (Figure 4A, Naive versus Behavior Alone, p = 0.019, t test). This result confirms that 20 days of behavior training generated a low-frequency map expansion. The pretraining procedure for the Pretrained Groups in Experiment 2 was identical to the procedure for the Behavior Alone group, and so all three Pretrained Groups selleck inhibitor must also have had low-frequency map expansions after 20 days of behavior almost training (Figures 4B and 4C). Twenty days of additional NBS-tone pairing followed by

10 days of additional behavior testing led to map renormalization in the Pretrained groups so that the organization of these rat’s auditory cortex was similar to naive animals (circles in Figure 4A; p > 0.15 for all groups, Figure S1). Renormalization occurred in all three groups, even though two groups experienced NBS-tone pairing and the control group experienced no NBS. All three Pretrained groups experienced the same behavior testing during the 10 days before physiology, implying that this 10 day period was sufficient to renormalize map plasticity in all three groups. Behavioral performance for all three Pretrained groups was not different from the Behavior Alone group immediately before physiology [Figures 4B and 4C; F(3,21) = 0.6664, p = 0.8369]. The observation that the Pretrained rats with map renormalization discriminated tones as well as rats with map plasticity (Behavior Alone) indicates that map plasticity is not necessary to accurately perform the low-frequency discrimination task. These results are consistent with previous reports that map plasticity occurs during learning and that map renormalization occurs even when training continues (Ma et al., 2010, Molina-Luna et al., 2008, Takahashi et al.