While, as yet, there is a lack of direct evidence examining differences in cortical inhibition in synaesthesia, this offers one plausible mechanism of neural development that may associate synaesthesia, schizotypy, creativity

and mental imagery. Delineating the relative contributions that extended cognitive manifestations and alterations in neural development have on the relationship between synaesthesia and schizotypy will provide important insights into the mechanisms that mediate the developmental of typical and atypical perceptual experiences. MJB is supported by a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship. This work was partly supported by an MRC grant to VW. “
“The concept FDA-approved Drug Library molecular weight of the visual word form is one that is well-established within the psychological literature. Cattel (1886) first documented ‘whole word’ reading by demonstrating how briefly presented words were

easier to recall than briefly Linsitinib presented meaningless letter strings, and letters have subsequently been shown to be better identified when presented within a word than individually (Reicher, 1969; Wheeler, 1970) or within a non-word (Grainger et al., 2003). More recently, neuroimaging studies have identified an area within the left fusiform gyrus which is specialised for letter and word recognition and which may constitute the visual word form area (VWFA; Cohen et al., 2000). Given the recency of written relative to spoken language as a cultural invention, it is unlikely that a VWFA would have evolved specifically for reading. However, one suggestion is that accumulated reading experience promotes the specialisation of a pre-existing inferotemporal pathway CYTH4 for higher-order visual processing (McCandliss et al., 2003). The current paper emphasises the extent

of this functional specialisation by demonstrating remarkably preserved reading in the context of profoundly impaired perception of non-word stimuli. Neuropsychological evidence supporting the existence of highly-specialised processes for visual word recognition has been derived from patients exhibiting ‘letter-by-letter reading’ (LBL; also referred to as ‘word form dyslexia’ or ‘pure alexia’; e.g., Shallice and Warrington, 1980; Farah and Wallace, 1991; Binder and Mohr, 1992; Warrington and Langdon, 1994; Hanley and Kay, 1996; Cohen et al., 2000). Such patients exhibit intact letter identification and relatively accurate, but slow, reading, whereby response latencies increase in a linear manner proportionate to word length. LBL reading has been suggested to reflect destruction or inaccessibility of a visual word form system, and is associated with damage to the VWFA (Warrington and Shallice, 1980; Cohen et al., 2000). The attribution of LBL reading to a specific word form deficit has been challenged on two main grounds, namely that the condition and its characteristic word length effects can be accounted for by a general visual deficit and/or a letter identification deficit.