, 1995), the disulphide bond oxidoreductase DsbA (Danese & Silhavy, 1997; Pogliano et al., 1997) and the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase PpiA (Pogliano et al., 1997). Other studies identified a number of signals capable of inducing the Cpx response. These include alkaline pH

(Nakayama find more & Watanabe, 1995; Danese & Silhavy, 1998), alterations to the composition of the IM (Mileykovskaya & Dowhan, 1997; Danese et al., 1998) and the expression of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) Pap pilus subunits in the absence of their cognate chaperone (Jones et al., 1997). All of these inducing cues are believed to have the common feature of generating misfolded periplasmic and/or IM proteins. From these results arose a model in which accumulation of misfolded envelope proteins activates CpxA, leading to the phosphorylation of CpxR and the upregulation of a suite of periplasmic chaperones and proteases that refold or degrade these misfolded proteins, thereby ameliorating the envelope stress. www.selleckchem.com/products/Abiraterone-Acetate-CB7630.html Although these

studies highlighted the importance of the Cpx response in E. coli’s ability to survive potentially lethal envelope protein misfolding, recent work has emphasized that this is only one facet of the Cpx system’s cellular role. Further examination of the signal sensing mechanism, regulon members and physiological functions of the Cpx pathway in E. coli and other bacteria has deepened our understanding of this important regulatory system. There is a growing recognition that signal sensing by 2CST systems is not accomplished solely by the HK input domain; in fact, many 2CST systems integrate a number of inducing signals using various domains of both the HK and the RR, as well as auxiliary sensing proteins (reviewed by Buelow & Raivio, 2010). In the case of the Cpx system, at least four proteins in different cellular compartments participate

in signal sensing: the outer membrane (OM) lipoprotein NlpE, the periplasmic protein CpxP, the IM HK CpxA and the cytoplasmic RR CpxR Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II (Fig. 1). NlpE (new lipoprotein E) was first identified as a multicopy suppressor of the toxicity of the envelope-localized LamB-LacZ-PhoA fusion protein (Snyder et al., 1995), with suppression being dependent on activation of the Cpx response (Danese et al., 1995). The physiological role of NlpE was not well understood until several years later, when Otto & Silhavy (2002) demonstrated that this protein is required for Cpx induction in response to adhesion to a hydrophobic surface. However, NlpE does not appear to be involved in sensing a variety of envelope stresses, such as alkaline pH or Pap subunit overexpression, because nlpE mutants retain their ability to activate the Cpx response in the presence of these cues (DiGiuseppe & Silhavy, 2003). More recent studies have shed some light into the mechanism by which NlpE activates the Cpx response.