5%] versus comparator 9 [0.4%]; in intravenous/oral studies:
moxifloxacin 26 [1.7%] versus comparator 13 [0.8%]), and the most Pictilisib cell line common AE in disfavor of the comparator was diarrhea (in oral studies: moxifloxacin 65 [3.6%] versus comparator 152 [7.4%]). Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) ADRs occurring in at least 0.5% of patients in either treatment group are shown in table IV. In the oral population enrolled in double-blind studies, the most common ADRs were nausea (moxifloxacin 602 [6.8%] versus comparator 457 [5.3%]), diarrhea (moxifloxacin 432 [4.9%] versus comparator 334 [3.9%]), dizziness (moxifloxacin 247 [2.8%] versus comparator 198 [2.3%]), headache (moxifloxacin 165 [1.9%] versus comparator 177 [2.0%]), and vomiting (moxifloxacin 162 [1.8%] versus comparator 150 [1.7%]). Only dysgeusia (moxifloxacin 66 [0.7%] versus comparator 171 [2.0%]) and increased GGT (moxifloxacin 11 [0.1%] versus comparator 30 [0.3%]) met the criteria set by the double filter used in table III. In the double-blind intravenous/oral population, diarrhea was the most common ADR (moxifloxacin 96 [5.1%] versus comparator
95 [5.1%]). Differences affected fewer than 10 patients in each treatment group, except for vomiting (moxifloxacin 13 [0.7%] versus comparator 26 [1.4%]). In the double-blind intravenous population, increased lipase (moxifloxacin 14 [2.4%] versus comparator 18 [3.2%]) and increased GGT (moxifloxacin 13 [2.2%] versus comparator 18 [3.2%]) were the most common ADRs, and only nausea showed a difference in disfavor of moxifloxacin versus comparator (12 [2.0%] versus AZD0530 solubility dmso 3 [0.5%], respectively) according to the double filter. In the open-label oral studies, nausea (moxifloxacin 77 [4.3%] versus comparator 44 [2.2%]) and diarrhea (moxifloxacin 54 [3.0%] versus comparator 141 [6.9%]) were again the most common ADRs across therapy
arms, followed by dizziness (moxifloxacin 30 [1.7%] versus comparator 4 [0.2%]), upper abdominal pain (moxifloxacin 23 [1.3%] versus comparator 20 [1.0%]), and vomiting (moxifloxacin second 20 [1.1%] versus comparator 14 [0.7%]), all experienced by >1% of patients in the moxifloxacin arm. Application of the double filter to the open-label oral population showed that diarrhea was more frequent with comparators (moxifloxacin 54 [3.0%] versus comparator 141 [6.9%]), whereas dizziness (moxifloxacin 30 [1.7%] versus comparator 4 [0.2%]), rash (moxifloxacin 16 [0.9%] versus comparator 8 [0.4%]), dysgeusia (moxifloxacin 13 [0.7%] versus comparator 2 [<0.1%]), and somnolence (moxifloxacin 10 [0.6%] versus comparator 2 [<0.1%]) were more frequent with moxifloxacin. In the open-label intravenous/oral population, diarrhea was the most common ADR for both moxifloxacin and comparator (61 [4.0%] and 60 [3.8%], respectively). Differences in disfavor of moxifloxacin versus comparator that met the double filter criteria concerned QT prolongation (moxifloxacin 19 [1.2%] versus comparator 3 [0.2%]) and dizziness (moxifloxacin 10 [0.