FishCom was applied in the study area to resolve a number of such

FishCom was applied in the study area to resolve a number of such conflicts. In most cases, actors involved arrived at a greater level of consensus, indicating that more conflicts in fisheries could be resolved if FishCom were institutionalized through coastal resource management plans. However, FishCom is not a panacea

for resolving all fisheries conflicts. Moving further in this direction would require harmonization of the functions and roles of a range of institutional stakeholders in organizing and implementing coordinated action plans for conflict resolution. The study showed that government and community partnerships can support movement toward more effective ways of managing conflicts and improve fisheries management. Representation and participation of users in the conflict

resolution Selleck PLX4032 process and involvement of fishers in the implementation of decisions are important factors mTOR inhibitor in legitimizing a management system (Salayo et al., 2008 and Pomeroy et al., 2007). These lessons could enhance opportunities for formulating policies and influencing policy actions for involving communities in the improved management of conflicts over shared resources. This study indicates that stakeholders recognized the value of multi-stakeholder forums in fisheries conflict management processes. They believed that the collective efforts of fishers, community members, and government and non-governmental organizations involved in fisheries management are required in order to design effective conflict resolution systems. Inter-sectoral analysis and dialogue undertaken by these stakeholders can facilitate better solutions to fisheries conflicts. The study shows that

committees of this nature are able to represent a genuine interest MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit in fisheries development, and can turn conflicts into opportunities for facilitating more sustainable use of fisheries resources. The authors thank the many stakeholders whose participation in the series of activities under the Enabling Conflict Resolution for Better Fisheries Management: Experience from the Marine Fisheries of Bangladesh project formed the basis for much of these outputs. Acknowledgments also go to Mr. Alan Brooks, Portfolio Director, WorldFish, Bangladesh and South Asia (2006–2009) and Blake Ratner, Senior Research Fellow/Program Leader, Governance, WorldFish for their valuable suggestions and comments. The authors are also thankful to Dr. Dilip Kumar and Dr. Apurba Krishna Deb, Team Leader and National Project Coordinator respectively of Empowerment of Coastal Fishing Community for Livelihood Security (ECFC) Project. The authors are however responsible for any unforeseen errors and omissions. This paper is a contribution to the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>