J Appl Polym Sci 121: 3347-3352, 2011″
“Purpose: To compare

J Appl Polym Sci 121: 3347-3352, 2011″
“Purpose: To compare changes in urinary viscosity in the renal tubules following administration of a high-viscosity iso-osmolar contrast agent (iodixanol) to that observed following administration of a less viscous, higher osmolar contrast agent (iopromide)

in anesthetized rats.

Materials and Methods: A total of 43 rats were studied. Experiments were approved by the Berlin, Germany, animal protection administration. A viscometer was developed to measure viscosity in minute samples (7 m L). Urine was collected, viscosity was measured (at 37 degrees C), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined by means of creatinine clearance. Boluses of 1.5 mL of iodixanol (320 mg iodine per milliliter, iso-osmolar to plasma, high viscosity) or iopromide (370 mg iodine per milliliter, higher osmolality and lower viscosity than iodixanol) were injected into the thoracic aorta. There were five groups (seven rats per group). Groups 1 (iodixanol) CX-5461 cell line and 2 (iopromide) had free access to water prior to the experiment; groups 3 (iodixanol) and 4 (iopromide)

received an additional infusion of isotonic saline (4 mL/kg/h). Group 5 was treated as group 1 but received only 0.75 mL of iodixanol. The observation period was 100 minutes. Statistical comparisons were made by means of nonparametric procedures (Friedman test, Kruskal-Wallis test).

Results: Iodixanol increased urine viscosity from learn more 0.69 to 36.7 mm(2)/sec; thus, urine became threefold more viscous than native iodixanol solution. The increase in urine viscosity after injection of iopromide was from 0.73 to 2.3 mm(2)/sec. While GFR was not significantly affected by iopromide, GFR transiently decreased by 50% after administration of iodixanol. Iopromide had a diuretic Tucidinostat research buy effect twofold greater than that of iodixanol. Saline infusion blunted the viscosity rise and transient decline in GFR caused by iodixanol, as did reducing the iodixanol dose by 50%.

Conclusion: Contrast media, in particular iodixanol, increase urine viscosity (which is equal to tubular fluid

viscosity in the collecting ducts); in response to iodixanol, GFR markedly decreases. Saline infusion attenuates this response, thus potentially explaining the protective effects of volume expansion in contrast medium-induced nephropathy. (C) RSNA, 2010″
“Low frequency noise in current biased La0.82Ca0.18MnO3 single crystals has been investigated in a wide temperature range from 79 to 290 K. Despite pronounced changes in the magnetic properties and dissipation mechanisms of the sample with changing temperature, the noise spectra were found to be always of the 1/f type, and their intensity (except for the lowest temperature studied) scaled as the square of the bias. At liquid nitrogen temperatures and under a bias exceeding some threshold value, the behavior of the noise deviates from the quasiequilibrium modulation noise and starts to depend in a nonmonotonic way on the bias.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>