\n\nMethods. Description of a 62-year-old male patient case who presented with chronic but progressive low cord myelopathy who underwent radiologic investigation through magnetic resonance imaging depicting a thoracic intramedullary cystic lesion at level T11.\n\nResults. Surgical excision find protocol of the intramedullary lesion was preformed and pathologic study confirmed a cysticercus. There was complete resolution of the neurologic symptoms and follow-up monitoring was unremarkable.\n\nConclusion. Although intramedullary is a rare NCC location, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis in high-risk populations especially when cord compression

and myelopathy symptoms are present. Magnetic resonance imaging remains the investigative and follow-up modality of choice, and promptly lesion recognition is fundamental for surgical planning and to improve the patient outcome.”
“Objective. To explore obstetricians’ opinions on cesarean section (CS) on maternal request in the absence of a medical indication, and the potential to regulate CS on maternal request through financial

incentives such as patient co-payment. Design. Cross-sectional study. Setting. Norway. Population/sample: A Liproxstatin-1 cell line total of 507 obstetricians (response rate 71%). Methods. Questionnaire covering socio-demographic variables, professional experience and attitudes about CS on maternal request (such as willingness to perform, views on how CS on maternal request should be financed). Main outcome measures. Obstetricians’ opinions about CS on maternal request including funding and use of patient co-payments. Results. Clinical encounters with CS on maternal request were considered problematic from a clinical viewpoint by 62% of the respondents. While 35% considered the costs of CS on maternal request to be a public responsibility, 40% suggested use of co-payments ranging from (sic)188-(sic)7,500. Male obstetricians less frequently considered CS on maternal request problematic and were

more likely to favor public funding than females. Baf-A1 Female obstetricians favored use of co-payments more often than males (64% female vs. 37% male obstetricians, chi(2) = 23.94, p < 0.001) and suggested higher co-payments. The median co-payment was (sic)1,875 for female and (sic)1,250 for male obstetricians (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The study supports the existence of a gender difference concerning obstetricians’ responses to patient requested cesarean section. The results indicate that a substantial proportion of obstetricians welcome some form of constraint concerning cesarean section requests in the absence of a medical indication.”
“We report on a 37-year-old woman presenting with atrial arrhythmias after catheter closure of a secundum atrial septal defect with an Amplatzer septal occluder device.