S. frugiperda microvillar proteins were previously identified in our laboratory by immunoscreening a cDNA library with antibodies against purified (cytoskeleton-free) microvillar membranes ( Ferreira et al., 2007). In spite of obtaining 137 unique MAPK Inhibitor Library purchase sequences, only clusters with two or more sequences (with a single exception) were taken into account in that paper, resulting in only 27 sequences. The availability of S. frugiperda midgut mRNA pyrosequencing data, prompted us to re-analyze all unique

sequences obtained in that study, including those discounted. The procedure used to accept, extend, and annotate the sequences were the same as described for microapocrine vesicle sequences. Forty-eight proteins are predicted to occur in S. frugiperda midgut microvilli ( Table 2). Other 18 were identified Selleckchem C59 wnt in microvilli preparations, but were considered to be contaminants, because they are typical of mitochondria (exemplified by acyl-CoA dehydrogense, succinyl-CoA

synthetase, and ADP/ATP translocase) and other non-microvillar cell parts (like 60S acidic ribosomal protein, glutamate dehydrogenase) or because they are unknown. These proteins are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Thus a total of 66 proteins were identified in microvilli preparations. Fig. 2 shows microvillar proteins classified into 8 functional groups: digestive enzymes, PM associated proteins (peritrophins), protection, transporter, receptor, secretory machine components, cytoskeleton and signaling, and unknown. Most sequences are classified under digestive enzymes, PM associated proteins, protection, and secretory machine components. Among the digestive enzymes, the most represented proteins are aminopeptidases

and carboxypeptidase (Fig. 2). Both enzymes types include members associated with the microvillar membrane by a GPI-anchor Anidulafungin (LY303366) (Table 2). The microapocrine vesicles (see Section 3.1) were injected in rabbits and the resulting antiserum was quite specific and recognizes most major microapocrine vesicle proteins, as revealed by Western blot (not shown). The microapocrine vesicle protein antiserum was used to screen a cDNA expression library of S. frugiperda midgut. The expected result was that clones recognized by the antibodies should correspond to expressed microapocrine vesicle proteins. Five hundred positive clones generated ESTs that, after trimming and quality estimates were used in a positive frame to be clusterized with CAP3 program, resulting in 51 contigs and 196 singlets. Sequences obtained by immunoscreening (labeled microapocrine sequences) were N blasted against the S. frugiperda sequences originating from pyrosequencing midgut mRNA. This procedure led to the extension of microapocrine sequences. Microapocrine sequences that have no homologous sequences among those obtained by pyrosequencing were discarded and the same was done for sequences with no hits in GenBank or having many predicted stop codons.